2025학년도 3월 고3 전국연합학력평가 영어 40번 문제

 40. 다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?

It may be assumed that meta algorithmics, that is, the creation of algorithms that generate other algorithms, is a human creation as well. A human programmer must have composed the first algorithm that, in turn, generates new algorithms and as such the initial programmer must be in control of the original idea. However, this is not necessarily true. Unlike humanly conceived ideas, where the author is the intellectual owner of the idea, algorithms are processes that define, describe, and implement a series of actions that in turn produce other actions. During the transfer of actions it is possible for a discrepancy to occur between the original intention and the actual result. If that happens then, by definition, the author of the algorithm is not in control of, and therefore does not own intellectually from that point on, the resulting process. Theoretically, ownership of an idea is intrinsically connected to the predictability of its outcome, that is, to its intellectual control. Therefore, in the absence of human control the ownership of the algorithmic process must be instead credited to the device that produced it, that is, to the computer.

* discrepancy: 불일치, 어긋남 ** intrinsically: 본질적으로

The new notion of intellectual ownership is created by meta-algorithmics, as algorithms can produce outcomes that are (A) to human programmers, potentially (B) ownership to the computer itself.

1. unpredictable ----- attributing

2. prescribed ------- attributing

3. unexpected ------ denying

4. unexplainable ---- denying

5. foreseeable ------ transferring

정답: 1번

It may be assumed that meta algorithmics, that is, the creation of algorithms that generate other algorithms, is a human creation as well.

메타 알고리즘, 즉 다른 알고리즘을 생성하는 알고리즘의 생성 역시 인간의 창작물이라고 가정할 수 있습니다.

A human programmer must have composed the first algorithm that, in turn, generates new algorithms and as such the initial programmer must be in control of the original idea.

인간 프로그래머는 최초의 알고리즘을 작성해야 하며, 이 알고리즘은 새로운 알고리즘을 생성해야 하므로, 최초 프로그래머는 원래 아이디어를 통제해야 합니다.

However, this is not necessarily true. Unlike humanly conceived ideas, where the author is the intellectual owner of the idea, algorithms are processes that define, describe, and implement a series of actions that in turn produce other actions.

그러나 이는 반드시 그런 것은 아닙니다. 작성자가 아이디어의 지적 소유자인 인간이 고안한 아이디어와 달리, 알고리즘은 일련의 동작을 정의, 설명, 구현하여 다시 다른 동작을 생성하는 프로세스입니다.

During the transfer of actions it is possible for a discrepancy to occur between the original intention and the actual result.

동작이 전달되는 과정에서 원래 의도와 실제 결과 사이에 불일치가 발생할 수 있습니다.

If that happens then, by definition, the author of the algorithm is not in control of, and therefore does not own intellectually from that point on, the resulting process.

이러한 불일치가 발생하면, 정의상 알고리즘 작성자는 그 시점부터 결과 프로세스를 통제할 수 없으며, 따라서 그 결과 프로세스를 지적으로 소유하지 않습니다.

Theoretically, ownership of an idea is intrinsically connected to the predictability of its outcome, that is, to its intellectual control.

이론적으로 아이디어의 소유권은 결과의 예측 가능성, 즉 지적 통제와 본질적으로 연결되어 있습니다.

Therefore, in the absence of human control the ownership of the algorithmic process must be instead credited to the device that produced it, that is, to the computer.

따라서 인간의 통제가 없는 경우, 알고리즘 프로세스의 소유권은 그것을 생성한 장치, 즉 컴퓨터에 귀속되어야 합니다.

The new notion of intellectual ownership is created by meta-algorithmics, as algorithms can produce outcomes that are unpredictable to human programmers, potentially attributing ownership to the computer itself.

지적 소유권에 대한 새로운 개념은 메타 알고리즘에 의해 만들어졌는데, 알고리즘은 인간 프로그래머가 예측할 수 없는 결과를 생성할 수 있으며, 잠재적으로 컴퓨터 자체에 소유권을 부여할 수 있습니다.